• Plastic technologies
  • Drip irrigation
  • High tunnels
  • Low tunnels
  • Mulches
  • Row covers

• Production details
  • Marketing of crops
  • Pest management
  • Post harvest
  • Stand establishment
  • Wind breaks

• Recycling and combustion
  • Recycling
    • Rigid plastic items
    • Film plastic items
    • Organizations
    • Activities elsewhere
  • High-temperature combustion
    • Penn State activities
      • Plastofuel
      • GR Technologies
      • Further information
• Photos
• Upcoming events

High Tunnel Tomato Variety Trial

Varieties:	Ultra Sweet, Mountain Spring, Mountain Fresh, Royal Mountie, Sunbeam, Seedway10250, Daybreak, NC Grape.
Bed Preparation:	Flat culture/Black plastic
Date seeded:	3/29/00 into 72 cell Speedling flats
Date Transplanted:	5/4/00
Design:	Randomized with 4 replications
Plot size:	20 plants per row (2 varieties per row); 80 plants per rep/house, 1.5ft between plants in row; 3.5ftbetween rows. Total area planted /tunnel ~ 0.006acres
Fertigation:	15lbs/A of 20-20-20 on 5/15/00 and 6/19/00.
Irrigation:	Drip irrigated approximately a total of 33 hours through the season.

Brief Summary
During the season, all varieties grew well and achieved relatively good yields. Plants were staked using the Florida weave system. Tomatoes were tied three times except for NC Grape* and Ultra Sweet*, which were tied four times (5/19, 5/30, 6/13, 6/23*). The plants were pruned a two different times. The NC Grape variety was topped/trimmed mid July to help manage the vigorous growth. Early and mid season, the crop was virtually free of insect pests and/or disease. However late in the season there was an outbreak of powdery mildew, followed by an infestation of white fly. In each tunnel it was observed that the mildew started in the middle rows and then quickly spread to the outer rows. Lack of sufficient air movement throughout the house may have contributed to the rapid spread of the mildew.
Two applications of Bravo (2lb/A) were applied to help manage the mildew, however the profuse foliage made it difficult to spray and attain good coverage. Consequently control was minimal. Attempts were made to promote as much air movement through the tunnel by letting the sides up as much as possible. Overall NC Grape and Seedway seemed to have fair amount of tolerance to the mildew. Ultra Sweet and Daybreak seemed the most susceptible (See Table 1).
Encarisa Formosa (bio-control) and insecticidal soap were used to help control whitefly infestations.

Powdery Mildew Ratingx
Variety	Dates
	7/13	7/20	7/27
	-----------------------Ratings (1-5)----------------------
Ultra Sweet	1.8	3.1	4.6
Sunbeam	0.0	2.0	4.1
Mt.Fresh	1.1	1.5	2.6
Mt.Spring	1.2	2.2	3.1
RoyalMountie	0.0	3.7	3.5
NC Grape	0.0	1.1	2.3
Daybreak	2.1	3.0	3.8
Seedway	0.0	1.2	2.5
Significance y	*	*	*
LSD (0.05)z	0.2	0.6	0.3

x Powdery mildew rating on a scale of 1-5: 1=least mildew on most leaves, 5= severe mildew on most leaves
y Treatment effects were significant at 5% (*) probability levels
z Least significance difference at the 5% level

Harvest:
NC Grape was the first to flower and fruit followed by Daybreak and Ultra sweet. NC Grape flowers had to be pinched off twice, to allow for crop maturation prior to fruit production.
Harvest of the crop commenced on 7/20/00. A total of 15 harvests were made, most harvests occurring twice a week. The last harvest was made on 10/10/00. However most of the varieties continued bearing and still had fruit on them until the first hard frost (10/28/00).
Overall the Mountain fresh had the highest marketable yield (weight) while Sunbeam had the lowest. Ultra Sweet produced the highest number of marketable fruit, however, most of the marketable fruit consisted of US #3 and #4 (Table 2). Ultra sweet had a significantly high cull compared to all other varieties. Most of the cull was as a result of misshapen fruit, cat facing, sun scalding, and blotch ripening. We also observed other defects including zippering, mouse damage, soft rot, (BER) blossom end rot, cracking and as well as both mouse and bird damage.

NOTE:
Please note on the tomato study, instead of 10/28 for first hard frost, it should read 10/29 when outside min. temperatures read 26.3F and the min. temps in the tunnels read an average of 29.8F.

Table 2 Tomato Variety Yield

	Total Yield		Marketable Yield											Cull Yield
	No.	Wt.			No.	Wt.				Percent by Grade				No.	Wt.	Percent
Variety	#	lbs	T/A		#	lbs	T/A		US #1	US#2	US#3	US#4		#	lbs	%
Ultra Sweet	2239	875.2			1886	708.3			19.6	16.5	24.8	23.3		353	166.9	15.8
Mt. Spring	1578	850.1			1419	780.9			49.2	21.4	13.2	6.1		159	69.2	10.1
Mt. Fresh	1921	906.2			1783	862.8			45	23.1	17	7.7		138	43.4	7.2
Royal Mountie	1432	808			1303	744			45.8	24.3	14.9	6		129	64	9
Sunbeam	1301	748.8			1183	689.7			58.6	18.1	10.3	3.9		118	59.1	9.1
Seedway	1566	816.7			1398	743.1			47.4	21.4	14.6	5.9		168	73.6	10.7
Daybreak	1670	840.5			1562	790.8			46.1	18.8	19.7	8.9		108	49.7	6.5
ANOVA lsd .05	412	63			229	70								99	61
NC Grape*		479.3				479.3

*NC Grape data not subjected to statistical analysis

**Note:A replication effect with replications 2 and 4 having significant higher yields compared to reps 1 and 3 was noted in the analysis. However this effect did not produce enough variation to diminish the overall effect of the variety on crop yield. Since we could not amend the soil this last season, I recommend taking soil tests in the four tunnels (probably in all others as well) and amend soil accordingly, prior to next cropping. Rep. effects are probably due to the fertilization study in 1999.